Standing with XRI

by C. O’Reilly

It’s a cold March morning as we gather on the north side of the graceful harp-like Beckett Bridge, which crosses the Liffey just up from its mouth.  We battle the breeze whipping upriver but soon we’re sorted, and we’re off!  

We are protesting against JP Morgan, a major sponsor of today’s National Payments Conference. JP Morgan Chase is the world’s no. 1 financier of fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement and JP Morgan’s asset management arm is one of the top investors in the 12 major oil and gas expansion companies.  The conference is to be opened by EU Commissioner Mairead McGuinness.

We certainly look incongruous: men and women, young and old, the leggings and rain jackets, the iconic XR flags flapping in the breeze, marching along like a merry band of medieval knights and mummers among the suited grim-faced Monday morning workers.

We head east along the river grabbing the attention of passers-by. Gone are the old docklands, thanks to container shipping. In their place stands the oh-so-flashy Irish Financial Services Centre (IFSC), a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), with its own trade laws.  It dominates the city from the Liffey mouth, a bastion of the Celtic Tiger, attracting foreign direct investment with its low corporate tax rate.  

The conference is being held in the Convention Centre, the landmark building of the district - ironically, said to be the first carbon-neutral conference centre in the world (with the help of Carbon Credits). It’s being run by the Banking and Payments Federation of Ireland (BPFI). Part of our message is to BPFI and other event hosts: Stop lending legitimacy to climate criminals like JP Morgan by taking sponsorship money from them.

We approach the building and there is a surge of excitement as some of our brave protesters dash onto the parapet that fronts the entrance in an attempt to gain access. But they are halted by Gardaí.  We are corralled back out onto the footpath where we line up – and the thirty or so of us, interspersed with banners carrying our message, make an impressive sight. Behind us, blocking the entrance, a row of Gardaí stand shoulder-to-shoulder, watching us. Reinforcements arrive, but there’s a peaceful vibe so they fade away.

Our drummers are impressive; you can feel the beat in the pit of your stomach as we cry out our protest chants.  There’s a megaphone.  A shaker adds depth and colour to the drum beats. In front of us is our pièce de résistance, a two-metre-high “Climate Reaper”, complete with scythe and dancing to the beat. Others dance in place to keep warm. I feel overcome with emotion; my fears and frustrations around the crisis well up in relief as I feel I’m not alone! 

We miss the arrival of Mairead Mc Guinness; she was probably smuggled in by the back entrance!  Other attendees are aware of us as they are directed away by the Gardaí.  We are watched by drivers heading up the quays and other passers-by.  Leaflets explaining our action are distributed.

We pack up, head to a nearby café to warm up and to discuss the day’s happenings, feeling satisfied that we have succeeded in putting on a good show and getting our message across.

JP Morgan “Climate Reaper” complete with scythe, covered in the logos of fossil fuel companies that JP Morgan has financed Photo by E Connolly

Monday, 4th March: Protesting JP Morgan’s funding of fossil fuels at entrance to Dublin Convention Centre where JP Morgan-sponsored BPFI conference underway Photo by A Deegan

Moving on after the protest Photo by K Handy

J.P. Morgan! There are no ‘Women in Tech’ on a dead planet

On the evening of 23rd March, I was among the XRI rebels who disrupted J.P. Morgan Dublin’s “Women in Technology” networking event to draw attention to the harm the company is doing by financing fossil fuel companies. It’s the worst of the big banks dubbed the “dirty dozen” in the 2022 Banking on Climate Chaos report. We also wanted to highlight the irony of their attempt to recruit women in particular, given the outsized harm that climate change does to women around the globe.

We seated ourselves dotted among the audience of about 70 people - a mix of potential recruits and employees. Just a few minutes into the opening remarks of one of four panellists on-stage, our first disrupter in the “audience” stood up declaring “There are no women in tech on a dead planet” and laying out a few of the facts about J.P. Morgan and their funding of climate chaos. She was immediately followed by another disrupter and so on until five of us had spoken  - each beginning with the same slogan and following that with our own variation on the theme. It  culminated with a call to action for those considering working for J.P. Morgan to reconsider and for those working there to demand that their employer divests from all fossil fuels. 

It was only when the fourth and fifth (final) speakers stood up that the organisers seemed to truly get a grip on what was happening before their eyes. One or two of them then went into containment mode - trying to get us to quiet down. Another was overheard calling the guards. When the last of us had stood up and spoken, we made our way with our Extinction Rebellion flags to just in front of the stage, chanting “J.P. Morgan pick a side, divest now, or ecocide”. 

At this point, the organisers called on the “audience” to relocate to a different room and they and the panellists started filing out. A few J.P. Morgan staff stayed behind with us. Staff member Emma Mangan, Head of CIB Merchant & Card European Head of Technology engaged with us. She suggested we fight for change by buying shares in the company and becoming shareholder activists. We responded by asking her to quit J.P. Morgan and put her expertise to good use by helping us fight their continued investment in fossil fuel companies. 

Panellist and Executive Director, Keith Staunton also stayed behind but did not engage, except to deny that he was the Executive Director when asked by one of the activists - after which she pointed out that it stated clearly on the projector slide that he was in fact! We activists exited the room and the building peacefully shortly thereafter. 

We went for drinks afterwards to celebrate the success of our action and to wind down together and share our individual experiences of the evening. One participant shared that some attendees seated in front of her were nervously giggling while the disruption was underway, until one of the disruptors spoke of the “sexual violence” that women suffer as one of the consequences of the displacement of people as climate refugees. Another participant had overheard two of the panellists as they filed out of the event room saying “They’re right, they have a point, we need to talk about this”.

For more background on the action, please see our Press Release and of course, please watch and share our video of this action!

Finally, if you’re reading this and you work in the financial sector, chances are the company you work for does invest in fossil fuels as, sadly, it appears to be the norm rather than the exception. So please do what you can to push them to divest if they haven’t already. Equally, if you know someone who works in the financial sector, please encourage them to do likewise. 

Angela Deegan

A rebel with Extinction Rebellion


Further Resources:

https://www.bankingonclimatechaos.org/

https://divestmentdatabase.org/report-invest-divest-2021/ 

Three XRI disrupters stand up and speak

Three of the five XRI disruptors

Stealing the show from JP Morgan to demand they Divest Now from fossil fuels!

Meet the Docklands tech consultant who says his fellow workers are the key to making business face its responsibilities on climate

Photo: Michael-David McKernan
Climate activist Manuel Salazar

Caroline O'Doherty

October 17 2022 02:30 AM
Link to the Independent newspaper article (Premium version)

The passengers exiting the Dart at Dublin’s Grand Canal Dock do not look much like revolutionaries. Dressed in smart casuals, wireless ear buds snugly in place, they alight observing polite “after you” protocols, laptop bags slung over shoulders, the occasional folded scooter in hand.

Their platform lies under the gaze of Google’s extensive European headquarters and they disappear inside or disperse to the banking, investment, legal and tech firms beyond.

Manuel Salazar easily blends in among them.

A consultant with PwC, one of the largest firms in Ireland and indeed the world, he specialises as a marketing technology strategist – MarTech, in Docklands speak.

He has held the job for 10 years and enjoyed it, mostly.

“It’s like a marriage,” he says. “It has ups and downs.”

Mr Salazar has a life outside of work that sets him apart from most of the Docklands commuters, though.

He is a member of Extinction Rebellion, the movement of climate activists responsible for some of the most elaborate demonstrations and civil disobedience campaigns this country has seen.

Before Covid, they paraded through this district, beating drums, chanting slogans, urging the workers to “leave your desks, join the march”.

Now, Mr Salazar says, instead of taking the workers outside, it’s time to bring activism inside the workplace and start a ­revolution from within.

With support from the State via a grant from the Creative Ireland Programme and backing from Trinity College Dublin under the Dublin Rising initiative, Mr Salazar made a short film setting out six steps he says every employee should take to push their employers to act on the climate crisis.

VIDEO: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/corporations-climate-change-taking-action-from-inside-manuel-salazar/

He urges them to ask employers to put climate change at the forefront of their daily operations and business strategies, and to conduct climate impact assessments on all projects undertaken.

He asks them to push for a public pledge to move away from using or supporting fossil fuels, to vet all clients and contracts for ties to the fossil fuel industry, and to ensure staff benefits such as pension funds are not investing in fossil fuels.

As a last resort, he says workers who cannot get their employers to engage constructively, should “wake up and walk out”.

The film is aimed at all workers but has particular resonance in the Docklands, home to many international banks and investment management firms and the legal and financial companies that support them.

Fossil fuels are still profitable, even more so in the current energy crisis, and there is no shortage of investors willing to back them or professional service providers happy to bid for their contracts.

That cannot continue if Ireland is to be serious about climate action, Mr Salazar says.

_______________________________

“I may be an employee of this company but I am also a climate activist. My child is the environment, it requires some attention, and I’m attending that emergency right now”

_______________________________

He put his five-minute film, expertly shot by a professional filmmaker, online on various social media channels and on his own LinkedIn account through which he connects with many client firms and other businesses.

It has been widely circulated across climate activism networks since.

Mr Salazar had already been reminded of his employer’s social media policy after posting some other climate-related material on sites he uses personally and professionally so he feels this move is likely to be put under the spotlight, but says he is prepared for that.

In his film, he anticipates some of the arguments that may be thrown against him, saying “activism does not diminish a profession”.

“My employer told me, ‘you are not a climate activist, you are an employee of this company’,” he explains now.

“I answered, ‘so, you are a leader in this company but you are also a father. If something happens to your child during working time, you leave everything, you go and attend that emergency because you are a parent, even in working time’.

“It is the same for me with climate change. It cannot be attended to only before 9am and after 5.30pm.

“I may be an employee of this company but I am also a climate activist. My child is the environment, it requires some attention, and I’m attending that emergency right now.”

On the question of whether “right now” is a good time given the cost-of-living crisis and the growing warnings about global recession, he says constant deferral of climate action is the costliest approach.

“I understand contracts are linked to jobs and the profit of the company and your boss doesn’t want to turn them down. But my argument is that if the employer really cares about you and jobs and future livelihoods, then they have to start moving away from those contracts that are linked to high carbon emissions. They have to consider not just one financial year but 20, 30, 40 years ahead. There are no jobs on another planet.”

He acknowledges that employees may be nervous raising climate issues with their bosses but says even where there are no trade unions, workers are more powerful than they think.

“We are in a climate crisis so they are valid questions to ask. It also alerts the employer about how the new workforce is thinking,” he says.

“That’s already happening in terms of inclusion and diversity. If you apply for a job, you can ask the employer: are you open to people of different sexual orientation or race?

“Those are now valid questions so why not climate change? Companies now want to show they are inclusive so they should be willing to show their green credentials too, but they need an engaged workforce to make this happen.

“I know in Ireland confrontation can be a bit challenging. It’s a cultural thing. But walkouts are a normal way to express discontent about a situation that needs to be addressed.

_______________________________

“Venezuela is one of the richest countries in the world in terms of oil and yet most people are poor. The cost, at human level, social level and environmental level is so high”

_______________________________

“So I don’t think any employer should be threatened by that because what we want at the end is to be proud to work with that company.”

He believes he is not the only one who feels like this.

“There are so many people out there that for sure feel the same and they probably don’t know how to move forward.

“I understand they are concerned about their jobs. We all have dependants, we all have bills to pay and families to feed. Myself, I support family back in Venezuela.

“But then, at the same time, if I don’t do anything I won’t be happy with myself. I have to put myself forward on the front line.”

Mr Salazar is an Irish citizen since 2012 and he came here via the Middle East, mainland Europe and the UK, but witnessing the impact of the oil industry in his birth country has stayed with him and shaped his views.

“Venezuela is one of the richest countries in the world in terms of oil and yet most people are poor. The cost, at human level, social level and environmental level is so high. The rivers are polluted, people displaced,” he says.

“Oil companies are calling themselves energy companies now and may be investing a little bit in renewables but it’s just to try to run away from the stigma of being a dirty industry.”

Mr Salazar says the Government should be more choosy about the overseas companies it encourages to come here.

“I think they have been very permissive by allowing certain companies that are actively investing in fossil fuels to enjoy the corporate tax that they have right now.

_______________________________

“You have a duty as a citizen to protect the country that you belong to and Ireland is my home”

_______________________________

“Government has to decide if their role is going to be just sitting back and watching what is happening because they are afraid of losing jobs, or to have a frank conversation with these companies, to have laws that will force them to change their behaviour.

“I am very proud to be an Irish person. I swore an oath to the country, that I need to protect Ireland from foreign and local threats.

“But sometimes I feel that my government and some companies are the local threat because by not protecting the environment, you are going against Ireland.

“You have a duty as a citizen to protect the country that you belong to and Ireland is my home.

“It’s the place I want to protect from climate change. I’m just asking other workers to help me.”

An Open Letter to Fossil Fuel Executives with Children

Written by Tom Adams

In January this year my partner gave birth to our first child. For me, the period since has been a wonderful and devastating time. Wonderful because I have seen at close hand how my daughter’s mischievous personality has emerged. Devastating because I have viewed this year’s climate destruction through the prism of her innocence and have helplessly projected forward to the ‘unrecognisable’ future awaiting her. In fact, when I shush her back to sleep, I now imagine that what has distressed her is not a nightmare but a realistic vision of life in 2050 or 2060. I remind myself she is one of the lucky ones. In the Global South, the lives of children are already being ripped away by global heating-induced disasters.

A while after my daughter’s birth I decided to contact an old friend who had also just become a father. Like you, he is a fossil fuel executive – in his case for one of the big players. I wondered if parenthood might have given him a different view of his industry. After exchanging photos of our little girls and concerns about the impacts of climate change – he was at least on board in this regard – I expressed my concern about the intransigence of Big Oil and Gas. His response depressed but did not surprise me. He highlighted the growing demand for energy, emphasised that the global economy was effectively built on oil and, in a curious echo of Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicky Hollub’s shame-faced statements at COP27, concluded that ‘people taking personal responsibility is going to be the key.’ 

It is true that those of us in developed countries need to rapidly decarbonise our lifestyles. But your industry is investing in our continued consumption by pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into terrifying fossil fuel expansion. It is also, as COP27 bleakly demonstrated, actively lobbying against a transition away from fossil fuels. The upshot of this is that the world will be driven way beyond 1.5C of heating, the only safe pathway for our planet and our children. The notion that growing energy use necessitates a continued supply of hydrocarbon furthermore negates the reality that renewable energy is already meeting increased electricity demand. Imagine how fast the energy transition might occur if, instead of enriching shareholders, hiding behind hollow net zero rhetoric and cynically deflecting blame onto individuals – a longstanding tactic – your industry used excessive profits to boost its meagre investment in green energy.

I recognise that fossil fuel executives like yourselves will not be convinced by my perspective. You have heard these arguments many times before. You have your own narratives. So let me reframe my plea in more emotive terms. The brutal reality is this: your children, like my daughter, are going to suffer from the deadly consequence of global heating. Bill McGuire, author of Hothouse Earth and professor of Climate Hazards at UCL, has described in unsparing terms what the coming decades will look like. Even in comparatively temperate regions like Ireland and the UK, month upon month of ‘blistering heat’ will turn cities into ‘unbearable saunas’, unleash new diseases, and further accelerate species loss. Rather than bringing respite, the truncated winters will see unimaginably destructive storms, river flooding ‘on a biblical scale’, and deluged coastal communities. Crop failures in even more vulnerable regions will increase food scarcity. Many, many people will die. 

Perhaps you imagine that your economic advantages will insulate your children from the most savage aspects of this breakdown. If so, contemplate the impact on their mental health, relationships and life expectations. A study last year found that four in ten children already fear having children due to the climate crisis. Imagine how much this will have spiked by 2050 when global temperatures are on average between 1.7C and 2.4C warmer and, as per a recent Unicef report, ‘virtually all children on Earth will face more frequent heatwaves’ among other unforgiving conditions. Will your children want to travel, to live abroad? In addition to the proliferation of wildfires and floods and droughts, the world will experience escalating political violence, social unrest, and geopolitical tension. The Institute for Economics & Peace has predicted that there will be over a billion people displaced by climate change. Consider how this level of migration will tear at the social fabric. It does not seem hyperbolic to suggest that the anxiety will be pervasive and potentially overwhelming. So many of us have had the luxury of being able to live freely and fully. Our children, on the other hand, are going to be in the business of survival. 

How will they view us? I don’t know about you, but this keeps me awake at night. I was born in 1986. More than half of all CO2 emissions since 1751 have been emitted since 1990. As a result of my Western lifestyle, I am intensely implicated, and I do not work as an executive in a fossil fuel company. If I did, I would be terrified. In our present 1.2C world there are children of fossil fuels executives who are already ashamed of their parents. Imagine how their anger is going to entrench as the window for a safely habitable world slams in their faces. Climate awareness is only growing among younger people. Climate education will likely become compulsory in schools and universities. Think where youth consciousness will be in ten or fifteen years after an exponential rise in tragedy and devastation. 

I’m sure that many of you are, like my friend, decent people motivated by the desire to provide for your families – maybe this is how you justify your careers. Our children will be the ultimate arbiters of our actions, however, and this will be guided by their lived experience. If they are left to battle things out on a hothouse planet, then no amount of PR or greenwashing will persuade your children that your role in a pollutive and profit-sick industry was anything other than a betrayal of their futures. Take personal responsibility. Transform your industry immediately or suffer their rejection.

Why climate activists will return to civil disobedience in 2023

As Just Stop Oil’s protests hit the headlines and Cop27 is dismissed by Greta Thunberg, We hear from campaigners who say disruptive action is necessary to raise the alarm

Naomi Sheena on Killiney Hill. Photo by Gerry Mooney

Tanya Sweeney (Irish Independent)

November 16 2022 11:40 AM

Famous artworks doused in soup. High-end shopfronts defaced. Football matches halted. Traffic brought to a standstill on the busiest motorway. If the goal of Just Stop Oil’s month of protests and civil disobedience was to get people talking about the climate crisis, they can consider it a job well done.

The group’s British arm has since announced that if their demands for change go unmet and Rishi Sunak’s government continues to issue new oil and gas licenses, they will escalate their protests.

Anna Holland (20) is one of the Just Stop Oil protesters who last month threw soup on Vincent van Gogh’s Sunflowers at the National Gallery in London and glued themselves to the wall beside the painting, which was not damaged. Bob Geldof called the act “clever”. “They’re not killing anyone,” he said.” Climate change will.”

“It’s been really crazy, in a good way,” Holland says of the fallout. “Obviously we received some hate for it, and there’s been controversy. But we knew that it was going to happen.”

Van Gogh stunt: Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland (right) during their Just Stop Oil protest at Britain’s National Gallery. Photo via Getty Images

A recent poll by the Guardian found that 66pc of respondents support civil resistance focusing on climate, but the public response to Just Stop Oil’s protests during October has been divided.

“We take our inspiration from examples in the past — the suffragette movement, the civil rights movement, the queer liberation movements,” Holland says. “They all used non-violent direct action. Even though they were controversial at the time, they worked. They were successful. Now we look back on them as people who broke the system and stood on the right side of history.”

She joined Just Stop Oil after getting frustrated with the lack of progress from conventional protests such as marches and petitions.

“It was like yelling at a brick wall,” she says. “Now, I finally feel like what I’m doing for the climate is making a difference.”

Closer to home, Extinction Rebellion Ireland (XRI) have undertaken protests across the country this year and are pledging to resume civil disobedience in 2023.

In June, XRI protesters took part in a demonstration at Dublin Castle during the National Biodiversity Conference, wearing hard hats and headlamps as part of what they called the “dead canaries in the coalmine” stunt, referencing 30 years of inaction on biodiversity. The protest, they said, led directly to conversations with Malcolm Noonan, the Green minister of state for heritage.

A month earlier, they protested outside the annual meeting of Smurfit Kappa in Dublin, accusing the packaging company of using commercial plantations in Colombia that displace the indigenous Misak people and harm the regional ecosystem. Within weeks, the issue had been raised in the Dáil. 

So far, so civilised. What “resuming civil disobedience” might look like for XRI’s Irish activists remains anyone’s guess. 

Members of the movement’s Dutch arm and Greenpeace caused disruption at Schiphol airport last week by cycling across the runway and sitting in front of private jets. It might not be far-fetched to predict a similar protest here.

Pedal power: Extinction Rebellion and Greenpeace activists disrupt flights at Schiphol airport in Amsterdam. Photo by Charles M Vella via Getty Images

There is a sense among protesters globally that the time for lip service has long passed. Greta Thunberg is skipping Cop27 in Egypt, describing the climate summit as little more than “an opportunity for leaders and people in power to get attention”.

Such scepticism is not unfounded. One of the main goals of last year’s Cop conference in Glasgow was to stay “within reach” of keeping global warming no higher than 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Yet the UN’s environment agency reported last month that there was “no credible pathway to 1.5C in place”. Current pledges for action by 2030, if delivered, would mean a rise of about 2.5C and catastrophic extreme weather, it warned.

Against this backdrop, XRI’s climate action campaign co-ordinator Manuel Salazar says its aims are simple: to “raise the alarm”; to challenge government, corporations and employers to take more action to protect the environment.

He admires Just Stop Oil’s month of back-to-back protests in the UK. “I think they have been fantastic, for many reasons,” he says. “They are bringing the conversation back into the media. They’re completely highlighting what is damaging or detrimental to the environment. I think there’s going to be a backlash to that, but at the same time, it will trigger the question of why we are doing this — and how urgent is it.”

He makes an interesting point about the subtext of this civil disobedience: if you think that stopped traffic or a defaced car showroom is an inconvenience, wait until the climate catastrophe really kicks in.

Referring to Holland and her fellow activist Phoebe Plummer’s fateful afternoon in the British National Gallery, he adds: “For people, it’s shocking to see that something we consider a beauty is getting [damaged] but at the same time, they don’t consider that nature has to be protected. People are more worried about something when it’s human-made, as opposed to our own nature.”

The Irish group is unlikely to do something similar, however, he suggests.

“People [in Ireland] don’t like much confrontation in that sense,” he explains. “Instead of blocking roads, we are just going to target those companies or the government or the bodies that are actually creating this crisis.”

Salazar, who works in Dublin as a tech consultant, joined XRI in 2019 and is part of a 500-strong membership that is diverse in age, origin and gender. Originally from Venezuela, he says he was “quite surprised” by the apathy towards the climate crisis in Ireland, both by individuals and government.

‘Surprised’ by Irish apathy: Activist Manuel Salazar. Photo by Steve Humphreys

“I guess there are several reasons for that: climate change hasn’t impacted Ireland so much as other countries, so around eight out of 10 people think that climate change is not affecting them directly, which is worrying,” he says.

“At the same time, 85pc of Irish people think that climate change needs to be addressed. But as long as it’s business as usual, and fires aren’t happening, or flooding is happening in our house, we won’t act on that. And that’s human nature. We are more reactive than proactive.”

Claire (not her real name) is a Dublin-born activist and academic who has sought to analyse the public’s apathy towards climate protesters and the crisis in general. Often, she says, apathy is a defence mechanism, a way to avoid facing up to the gravity of a situation.

“There’s this conception that protesters are in some ways going too far,” she says. “Many people would just prefer that there’s a lane and you stay in it.”

Naomi Sheehan has witnessed first-hand the devastating effects of climate change more than once. In 2019, the Dubliner was caught in the California wildfires, in a horrifying situation where she did not have access to food or water.

Until recently, she lived in Switzerland and witnessed some of the extreme flooding that swept through Europe last summer, which killed at least 243 people. There was also a huge mudslide near her home.

Afterwards, she talked about the mudslide with her nine-year-old godchild and her young friends. “She said, ‘Did you know this was going to happen?’, and I had to say to her, ‘Yes, I knew’,” says Sheehan.

“She looked at me with such hatred. She then said, ‘We need you to be the adults. We’re children. You’re supposed to be protecting us, not the other way around’. They were crying their eyes out because their lives were about to end over this, and that’s not OK.

“It’s why I changed my life. As soon as I knew how bad the climate crisis was, I did everything I could in terms of trying to change things.”

She believes the Irish government is not doing enough to warn the public about the urgency of the crisis.

“They put a load of numbers out there, but a lot of people don’t speak in numbers,” she says. “Now, I ask people, ‘Where are you going to be in 30 years’ time and how old will you be? Because I’ll be 70 and I’m not prepared to fight anybody for food or water, which we will have to do’. And I’ve yet to meet someone who is prepared.”

Sheehan left her well-paid executive role to do a master’s in sustainable development. Now a sustainable development scientist, she is also a member of Scientist Rebellion, an environmentalist group populated mainly by scientists.

Ian Coleman from Wexford joined the group after doing a master’s in bioinformatics at Wageningen University in the Netherlands. He too has been heavily involved in staging protests, including at the World Health Summit in Berlin last month.

“For Scientist Rebellion particularly, I think it’s good to get through to people that this isn’t just a bunch of people you can dismiss as hippies or radicals,” he says. “These are real scientists, getting arrested on the streets because they’re so worried about this.”

Speaking of dismissing activists as radicals, Sheehan says Just Stop Oil’s recent protests have been unfairly maligned.

“There’s a lot of heavy criticism coming in for JSO, and people are saying, ‘This is not the way to do it, you’ve lost me’ kind of thing,” she says. “I’ll be honest, 10 years ago I’d probably have said the same thing. But when you’ve seen the climate collapse events that I’ve witnessed, all you can think of is, ‘I should have been doing way more’.

“If a group of people are being ostracised for trying to save their own lives, as well as yours and mine, well I think we really need to take a look at our collective morals and values.”

It’s not just younger people who are feeling disaffected enough to get out and protest. After retiring, Dubliner Louis Heath joined Extinction Rebellion in 2019. Within a year, he had hit the headlines with a protest at Killiney Bay over rising sea levels, dressing as a ‘sea god’ alongside fellow activist Ceara Carney.

Heath is a vegan and decided some years ago not to take any flights but something bigger started to shift within him in 2018. “I started getting feelings about the urgency of climate, and I think it was the first time I considered extinction as a possibility with climate change,” he says.

Why does he believe that civil disobedience and protests work? “Politicians are vote-orientated,” he says.

“I remember we were chasing Richard Bruton [then minister for the environment] in all the places he was giving speeches and addresses. He was hounded by us. You could see the expression in his face, ‘No, not them again’.

"One time he was coming out of a talk in Malahide and we sat down at the front of the car and back of the car, but we stopped the car from moving. He was so frustrated and he was ranting and raving, and went off to get a taxi. At that time in 2019, it got into the newspapers. That definitely had an impact.”

Louis Heath with his Extinction Rebellion flag: ‘If we were in the UK, I would surely have been arrested several times’. Photo by Mark Condren

Heath has also been involved in demonstrations where traffic has been stopped. “We always inform the guards that we’re doing it, because you’re limited to seven minutes — it’s not disrupting traffic too much. We usually have biscuits or buns and we hand them to people and have a leaflet.

"We’d apologise and explain to them we’re in a crisis, and they’re generally fine. You’d meet the odd person in a mad rush, but they’re few and far between, actually. It’s sort of acceptable here. If we were in the UK, I would surely have been arrested several times.”

Heath says that stopping public transport can run the risk of “alienating” people: his own activism in the future, he says, is likely to involve “getting into more detail and easily digestible ways of bringing the message across in a more informed and detailed way”.

The task of prompting corporations and governments to enact meaningful change continues. Asked what measures individuals can take to make even a small difference in the face of looming catastrophe, Heath says: “People can find carbon footprint calculators online. Friends of the Earth have a good one.

"Firstly, people should be aware of their own carbon footprint and the ways to reduce this. If everyone in Ireland reduced their output by one tonne of CO2, it would reduce Ireland’s total emissions by approximately 12pc. That would make a phenomenal difference.”

Coleman of Scientist Rebellion suggest emailing TDs to ask: “Are we still subsidising fossil fuels years after Ireland has declared a climate emergency? And if so, can we move that subsidy into some other way to make people’s lives easier, without funding the murder of our youth and the next generations?”

He adds: “There is so much despair around this [issue] and if you look at the scientific literature on the psychology of all of this, it’s really devastating. The burnout rates in activism are so high, but then, when people actually participate and get on the streets, it sort of lifts the despair a bit.”

Clontarf-based fossil fuel company feels the heat from XR

By Angela Deegan, Extinction Rebellion

In May this year, a short article in the business pages of the Irish Independent caught my attention. The article titled “Clontarf Energy acquires 10pc stake in Western Australian gas prospect” dispassionately stated that the British-registered, Irish-based oil and gas explorer had “acquired 10pc of an offshore gas prospect in Western Australia for $4m (€3.8m)” and that drilling was expected to start drilling in June. Nothing exciting to see here. Just another company selling out our future for the chance at some big profits! 

It struck me how this company was “hiding in plain sight” in a Dublin suburb while engaging in fossil fuel operations halfway across the world! I was outraged and motivated to take action with Extinction Rebellion (XR) - which we would do over the following months, with some surprises along the way. 

The first step was sending a letter from XR to the company asking for a meeting to discuss the imperative of changing their business model away from fossil fuel investments. The letter elicited a quick, defensive response - but one that failed to respond in any way to the request for a meeting. So we formed a group within XR to brainstorm ideas. The group included people brand new to XR - Eoin Galavan, a psychologist living in Howth and Diarmaid Lawlor, a legal office assistant living in North County Dublin. 

Clontarf Energy Plc (CE) headquarters are in an unassuming two-storey seafront building at 162 Clontarf Road, Clontarf, Dublin. It actually houses multiple companies, including those of the “162 Group” - with many of the same directors in common. The focus of the 162 Group is “high potential natural resource start-ups. The principal is to marry geological risk against political uncertainty.” 

CE has investments in oil & gas exploration in Chad, Ghana and, most recently, off the coast of Western Australia. The company’s interim statement for the period ended June 2022 states “Shortages of piped gas and LNG feedstock have driven prices to record levels. There has rarely been a better time to hold prospective acreage.” It’s clear that this company can’t see past potential profits to the havoc and suffering that greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are unleashing on our climate - just this year devastating droughts in China & Europe; wildfires in Spain, Portugal and France; flooding in Pakistan; drought leading to starvation in the Horn of Africa, etc.

On 28th July, holding a big red “Stop Fossil Fuels banner”, we marched along the seafront to 162 Clontarf Road, where XR rebel Jeffrey Sardina proceeded to the front door with our letter repeating our demand for a meeting. To our surprise, two of the three directors of the company - David Horgan, Chairman and Jim Finn - were there and invited us in. (It turns out they had been tipped off the previous day by the Press about our plans.)

They met with Jeffrey and me while the rest of the group protested outside. We told the Directors about the devastation that fossil fuels are causing and about the climate anxiety that we feel and that we regularly hear expressed by friends, acquaintances and members of the public. We told them they had to get out of fossil fuel exploration and asked them to do some soul-searching about the evil that is fossil fuel exploration in an age when we understand so well the destruction these fuels are causing. When we weren’t getting anywhere, we asked to bring a climate scientist with us for a follow-up meeting and they agreed to a 12th September meeting.

In doing outreach to the public at Vernon Ave, Clontarf after the meeting, we found most people had no idea that there was a fossil fuel company just up the road from them and were supportive and appreciative of what we were doing.

In the intervening weeks, we had new members join our XR group - including Tom Adams, a student counsellor at TUD, and Enda Kelly, a student living in Carlow. One of our group members alerted us that Horgan was a signatory to the ‘There is no Climate Emergency declaration’ on Clintel.org, a project by a lobby group funded by two Dutch millionaires. We also observed that Horgan was regularly being interviewed on several Irish radio stations - RTÉ, Newstalk, Radio Nova and Today FM. It’s outrageous that radio stations give this man a platform that lends him credibility while he draws from the climate denier playbook. So we started a petition on Uplift.ie, calling on these radio stations to stop giving airtime to climate deniers like Horgan and instead ramp up coverage of the climate crisis and climate solutions. 

A week before the scheduled September 12th meeting, word came from Horgan that he wouldn’t be available for the meeting as he was travelling to Bolivia on business - despite the date for the meeting having been set to suit CE. He was obviously thumbing his nose at us. We went ahead with preparing for the meeting nonetheless, including public outreach in Clontarf and neighbouring Fairview in the week prior to it. On 12th September, we showed up at the appointed time. Climate Advisor and Sustainable Human Development Scientist and XR rebel, Naomi Sheehan, came with us. CE director Jim Finn came to the door, but he claimed that the meeting had been cancelled by Horgan. It was clear he didn’t want to meet with any of us. However, he finally agreed to meet with Naomi alone. 

Naomi focused largely on the business, financial and humanitarian risks of the climate emergency. She emphasised to Mr Finn that our current fossil-fuel based course is leading us on a pathway to human extinction, with 39 countries worldwide on the brink of famine and hunger projected to increase 6-fold to 840 million people by 2030; that economically, the losses from climate change globally by 2050 would be equivalent to 3 or 4 back-to-back Covid size pandemics, torpedoing the global economy like no event ever before; that CE’s office and many thousands of homes could be under sea level within 20 years and that upset homeowners would be demanding compensation from those responsible for this catastrophe - such as fossil fuel executives and politicians. This seemed to register with Finn.

She reminded him that every fraction of a degree of warming counts, and that misinformation and climate denial were enabling the continuation of inaction. Finn seemed surprised to learn that his co-director Horgan was a signatory of the ‘There is No Climate Emergency’ declaration and said it would be ‘silly’ to deny climate change. Despite that, he still insisted that the company needed to continue their fossil fuel investments for about ten years - while they awaited their investments in lithium mining in Bolivia turning a profit! He also posed the “why us” question - i.e. why don’t you pick some of the bigger fossil fuel players? Of course, that’s what all fossil fuel companies want - to be left alone to make their profits, however devastating the costs to others.

While Naomi and Mr Finn talked, the rest of us rebels protested outside on both sides of Clontarf Road with banners with the slogans ‘Stop Fossil Fuels’ and ‘Burning us Alive’. One of our group - Seán Loughran from Balgriffin - had arrived early and written “Clontarf Energy Are Responsible For Rising Seas” in huge chalk lettering on the footpath outside the offices - before cycling off to work. Some members of the general public and a local Green Party councillor, Donna Cooney, stopped by to support the protest. The action made ‘Irish Times Photo of the Day’ with a little help from Councillor Cooney’s dog. 

After the protest, XR protestor Suzanne Brewer, a teacher from Raheny, witnessed the chalk artwork being washed off the footpath by a contractor who had apparently just been waiting in the wings for us to leave. Presumably the truth in the chalk messages made CE uncomfortable. 

After two meetings/protests with CE, we hope we have opened a chink in their armour. What we know for certain is we have raised awareness about the existence of this fossil fuel company among their Clontarf neighbours. This XR group’s focus now is on getting more signups to the petition asking Irish radio stations to stop giving a platform to climate deniers - like Horgan - who have a vested interest in the promotion of fossil fuels. When we have enough signatures, we will approach the radio stations with the petitions in hand to engage in discussion about the importance of giving climate science and policy experts airtime - not climate deniers with self-serving motives - and getting some real commitments from them on this front. 

Please help us meet/exceed our goal of 1,000 signatures on the petition. Sign it, if you haven’t already done so - and if you have, think of at least two others you can ask! And get involved in climate action yourself - if not with XR, then with one of the many other excellent groups out there. Remember, the greatest threat in the overarching climate and biodiversity crises we’re in now is the belief that someone else will fix them!

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

By Angela Deegan


Why we need green hydrogen - but beware of the greenwash!

Written by Elaine Baker

Why do we need to store energy?

Switching from fossil fuels to renewables is essential for de-carbonisation.  For most renewables, such as wind and solar, we can’t turn them up and down according to our needs.  This is a key argument used by the fossil fuel lobby against renewables – the fossil fuel lobby try to persuade us that we still need fossil fuels for when the wind is not blowing or the sun is not shining.  However, to eliminate fossil fuels, what we actually need are ways of storing energy when the wind is blowing and the sun is shining, for use when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining.   This is energy storage.

What are the different types of energy storage?

The most promising technologies for energy storage are batteries, green hydrogen, and pumped water (like Turlough Hill).  Each of these have different advantages and disadvantages, so we probably need a combination of them.  Some of them are more suitable for short term storage (e.g. storing some energy daily for use during the early evening peak) and others are more suitable for long term storage (e.g. storing energy annually for use during the winter peak).

What are the pros and cons of green hydrogen relative to other energy storage?

Green hydrogen vs batteries: Hydrogen storage infrastructure lasts a long time whereas batteries wear out quickly, green hydrogen is more suitable than batteries for storing large quantities of energy for months, and currently there are human rights and local environmental issues around extractive mining for several battery minerals.   

Green hydrogen vs pumped water: Green hydrogen storage can be built in many places, whereas pumped water storage can only be done in places with certain topology, and can also have negative local environmental effects.

However, when converting electricity to green hydrogen, a lot more energy is lost in the process relative to batteries or pumped storage.  So each is suitable in different circumstances. Some of the problems with batteries can be reduced by better policy, recycling and technology, but green hydrogen is an important option, particularly for months-at-a-time storage.

Beware of the greenwash!

While green hydrogen energy storage is likely to be a very important piece of the de-carbonisation puzzle, there is a lot of greenwash to look out for!

-       No to grey hydrogen! Hydrogen can also be produced from fossil fuels directly, or can be produced from electricity where the electricity has been produced from fossil fuels (even worse, as even more carbon emissions involved).  Hydrogen produced using fossil fuels is called grey hydrogen.  We need to produce hydrogen only at times when there is a surplus of renewables on the electricity grid – this is green hydrogen.

-        No to blue hydrogen! The fossil fuel lobby try to get around this by saying they can capture the carbon and store it while they are producing hydrogen from fossil fuels.  They call this blue hydrogen.  We need to not emit carbon in the first place, not emit it and then use up lots of energy trying to capture it again!  The best  carbon capture technology by far is provided by nature - the tree and other natural carbon sinks.  Artificial carbon capture and storage (CSS) technologies do not make any sense.

-        No to new gas pipelines! The fossil gas industry argues in favour of investment in new fossil gas pipelines because they say they can also be used to transport hydrogen.  We need to be very careful about this – most gas pipelines can only be used for hydrogen if the hydrogen is mixed with a lot of fossil gas!  Also, it is a lot quicker and more efficient to transport energy by sending electricity via cables than by sending hydrogen via pipelines.

-        Beware of “We will convert fossil gas generators to hydrogen generators later” – It may be possible to convert existing fossil gas electricity generators into hydrogen electricity generators, but we have to be really careful not to allow this to justify new fossil gas generator investment that turns out to be costly or difficult to convert – this can be a back door to fossil fuel lock-in.

Hydrogen has a lot of potential to support de-carbonisation, but also can be used by the fossil fuel lobby to greenwash fossil fuels – let’s support the move towards genuinely green hydrogen and not be tricked by the greenwash!

Full and Final Ban on Petroleum Licencing Now!

Extinction Rebellion held a demonstration outside Sinn Féin’s headquarters in Dublin this afternoon, at 12pm Wednesday the 8th of December. This was to “highlight Sinn Féin’s lack of timely action to prevent oil exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in Northern Ireland”.

The DUP Minister of Economy, Gordon Lyons, is currently reviewing Petroleum Licensing Policy and intends to introduce petroleum licensing policy options into Northern Ireland Executive before Christmas. Extinction Rebellion spokesperson, Oscar Mooney, said that the activist group “calls on Sinn Féin to act now in the Northern Irish Executive to ensure a full and final ban on petroleum licensing.”

A full ban on fracking is currently a stated policy of Sinn Féin. The two fracking applications currently being lodged would allow drilling and fracking to occur at two locations in Northern Ireland, in County Fermanagh and at Lough Neagh.

In 2019, Sinn Féin issued their Climate Minority Report in which they recommend “an all-Ireland approach to climate action”, as well as more ambitious targets on renewable energy generation. While fracking is currently banned in the Republic of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England, there is no ban in place in Northern Ireland.

Sinn Féin put forward a bill the Northern Assembly to ban fracking. In the bill, an earlier term “all rocks” was replaced by “shale or encased in shale”. According to Extinction Rebellion, this would “leave Northern Ireland open for fracking in sandstone and coal bed methane”. It is currently considered unlikely for the bill to pass before the Northern Ireland election in Spring 2022.

Fracking results in the release of greenhouse gases and other dangerous pollutants including methane into the local air and water systems. Methane has a global warming potential 84 times greater than that of carbon dioxide. Fracking can also cause the release of contaminants into nearby ecosystems, which can travel through hydraulically connected systems, such as rivers or aquifers, and other connected natural systems. The carcinogens in the air  produced from fracking can travel up to 100 miles putting the people in the Republic at risk from health harms of fracking in Northern Ireland. 

A recent publication by the Irish Centre for Human Rights found that fracking is in violation of the right to life, right to water, right to health, right to housing, and the right to a safe, clean, environment amongst many other rights. The community around Lough Neagh including the people living in Belfast rely heavily on the lough, using it for 40% of their drinking water, and any contamination would lead to dangerous chemicals entering their water source.

Tom White from Belcoo Frack Free stated that “once drilling starts, contamination will be a very real health risk to the locals,” and asked if “Sinn Féin [is] going to fail to defend Human Rights?”

Sinn Féin has previously been vocal about banning fracking across the Island, as demonstrated in their policy documents and election manifestos.

The activist groups call on Sinn Féin to “work with other parties UUP and Alliance and form a policy that will ban licenses.” Dianne Little from LAMP Fermanagh said that “if fracking is allowed to occur in Northern Ireland, the price will be illness, real pain, and suffering to people on both sides of the border in Ireland and in communities most vulnerable to climate change impacts.”

De-carbonize the internet

Think global, act local

Think global, act local

Written by Elaine Baker

Extinction Rebellion has recently been taking action to halt the huge new fossil-fuel guzzling data centres which are being proposed in Ireland. Data centres consume a lot of energy. For example, the proposed data centre in Ennis would have a 200 MW load - equivalent to the electricity consumption of approximately 210,000 homes, which is the number of homes in Clare, Limerick and Kerry combined [1].  

However, data centres make the internet work. So how are data centres and fossil fuels linked, and how can the internet be decarbonised? We need to call for real internet decarbonisation and not be trapped by greenwash smoke-and-mirrors mechanisms such as “Guarantees of Origin”.

There are two big issues in electricity decarbonisation: increasing the quantity of renewables, and managing timing and energy storage.

Quantity of renewable supply: we need a lot more renewable generation on the grid, to cater for existing electricity needs, to enable transfer of heating and transport from fossil fuel to decarbonised electricity, while ensuring that essential needs and the most vulnerable are prioritised in a just transition, and using the electricity we have more efficiently.

Storage and timing: many renewables, such as wind and solar, cannot be timed or turned up and down at will. To avoid using fossil fuels as backup when there is low wind and sun, and to avoid wasting renewable energy when there is surplus supply from wind and sun, we need to use more when it is available and use less when it is not, and we need to store renewable energy when it is available, for use when it is not.

Current data centre plans = more fossil fuel generation.  Many current data centre plans, including the Ennis plan, involve either the data centre installing it’s own large-scale fossil fuel generation, or the grid being forced to procure fossil fuel generation to keep up with the data centre’s demand whenever it wants it.  The Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU) recently issued a consultation paper recommending that data centres be obliged to adhere to “connection measures” to be flexible in their timing of use of grid electricity, but the paper fails to clearly distinguish between a) flexibility through storage, b) flexibility through matching real time electricity usage to the timing of the wind and sun, and c) flexibility through private data-centre operated fossil fuel generation. The first two can be compatible with decarbonisation, the last is not. 

The greenwash trap. We need to be careful of data centres (and other businesses) claiming they are 100% renewable because they have purchased “guarantees of origin”. These are credits from renewable suppliers which are not even connected to the electricity grid the data centre is connected to, and which are not producing electricity at the time it is being used by the data centre. This is smoke-and-mirrors greenwash and doesn't do anything to prevent the Irish grid using fossil fuels. Instead, we need to focus on the "carbon intensity" of the grid they are using (the Irish grid), at the time they are using it. Carbon intensity means grams of CO2 equivalent emitted per kWh of electricity produced, and it can vary substantially according to the wind. Data centres should be required to use or store electricity when the carbon intensity is low, and not draw from the grid at all when there is a shortage of renewables like wind or solar.

Demands to data centres: Examples of pre-conditions which could be set out for new data centre proposals include:

  • No new fossil fuel burning infrastructure should be installed to power the data centre, either on or off site, either owned and operated by the data centre owner/operator or otherwise

  • The data centre should be required to invest in renewable energy generation on-site, or close by on the grid it is connected to (ie the Irish grid)

  • The data centre should be required to consume grid electricity only at times when there is surplus wind or other renewable energy on the grid. They may install batteries or other energy storage infrastructure to facilitate this. This should be linked to real-time carbon intensity of the grid, not "Guarantees of Origin" or other ineffective mechanisms.

Think global, act local: At a global level, data centres need to be located in places where they can be powered by 100% renewables, either real time or stored. Only then will we have a de-carbonised internet. We need a “Not here, not anywhere” approach to blocking development of fossil-fueled data centres, acting in solidarity with others taking action on this issue around the world.

[1] Analysis of Ennis Data Centre planning application by Futureproof Clare, Extinction Rebellion Clare and Clare Environmental Network, August 2021

[2 ] Commission for Regulation of Utilities https://www.cru.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CRU21060-CRU-consultation-on-Data-Centre-measures.pdf June 2021

[3] Eirgrid http://smartgriddashboard.eirgrid.com/